Why is it so cold inside?

No-one can answer the questions that you ask, because the essential point of a question is to discover, and the mind does not accept any discovery that has not been proved to the mind’s standard. Hence, no answer is accepted by your mind in response to your question because actually, unless you and the responder are in a metaphysical ‘sync’, they cannot know exactly what you are asking. So then that would, by a domino effect, mean that only you can answer your question.

Now what happens when the question you ask has no answer? Why do we say that the sun ‘rises’ when actually the sun doesn’t move? We’ve asked a question about something that has been proven in order to try and disprove what someone else has discovered!

Humans try to disprove what others have proven because they don’t believe something unless they themselves have seen the proof.

This contrary attitude is what made mankind evolve. Evolution, as Charles Darwin studied it, is merely the cancelling out of all the wrongs, and the formatting and re-booting of all the rights. He didn’t use that new-techno language, of course, but that’s the gist of what he meant.

Basically, the world would have not got anywhere without some deleting. If we hadn’t lost our curved spine and tail, we wouldn’t be tall and upright. If we hadn’t got rid of scaly skin when we reptiles (which we weren’t ever really, but then it’s possible to say that we were because we evolved from something that evolved from reptiles,) we would still be slithering and sliming today.

So thanks to man’s contrary physique, contrary thoughts, and contrary nature, we are who we are today!

Though sometimes I feel like the contradictoralists of this world are actually sending it backwards, not forwards. Those people who put up an argument to everything seem to be holding up procedures, and preventing progress: and yet that very same annoying trait is what built Man. It’s probable that back in BC nine thousand hundred and seventy seven, one caveman said, or rather, grunted, to another caveman, telling, or grunting, him to stop. That pause in Caveman A’s life might have stopped him from attacking a monkey, which in turn stopped the monkey from dying, which then led to more monkeys being born, which eventually resulted in more food for Caveman A. Caveman B’s annoying pause, meant that there was more food for mankind.

So us Humans try to stop each other, for maybe not so generous and useful motives as caveman B’s, but yet we still cause our race to improve. We’re pretty cool, aren’t we? (This is where you say you don’t believe me, and start some annoying little disagreement that will eventually better mankind.)