No-one can answer the questions that you ask, because the
essential point of a question is to discover, and the mind does not accept any
discovery that has not been proved to the mind’s standard. Hence, no answer is
accepted by your mind in response to your question because actually, unless you
and the responder are in a metaphysical ‘sync’, they cannot know exactly what
you are asking. So then that would, by a domino effect, mean that only you can
answer your question.
Now what happens when the question you ask has no answer? Why
do we say that the sun ‘rises’ when actually the sun doesn’t move? We’ve asked
a question about something that has been proven in order to try and disprove
what someone else has discovered!
Humans try to disprove what others have proven because they
don’t believe something unless they themselves have seen the proof.
This contrary attitude is what made mankind evolve.
Evolution, as Charles Darwin studied it, is merely the cancelling out of all
the wrongs, and the formatting and re-booting of all the rights. He didn’t use
that new-techno language, of course, but that’s the gist of what he meant.
Basically, the world would have not got anywhere without
some deleting. If we hadn’t lost our curved spine and tail, we wouldn’t be tall
and upright. If we hadn’t got rid of scaly skin when we reptiles (which we
weren’t ever really, but then it’s possible to say that we were because we
evolved from something that evolved from reptiles,) we would still be slithering
and sliming today.
So thanks to man’s contrary physique, contrary thoughts, and
contrary nature, we are who we are today!
Though sometimes I feel like the contradictoralists of this
world are actually sending it backwards, not forwards. Those people who put up
an argument to everything seem to be holding up procedures, and preventing
progress: and yet that very same annoying trait is what built Man. It’s
probable that back in BC nine thousand hundred and seventy seven, one caveman
said, or rather, grunted, to another caveman, telling, or grunting, him to
stop. That pause in Caveman A’s life might have stopped him from attacking a
monkey, which in turn stopped the monkey from dying, which then led to more
monkeys being born, which eventually resulted in more food for Caveman A.
Caveman B’s annoying pause, meant that there was more food for mankind.
So us Humans try to stop each other, for maybe not so
generous and useful motives as caveman B’s, but yet we still cause our race to
improve. We’re pretty cool, aren’t we? (This is where you say you don’t believe
me, and start some annoying little disagreement that will eventually better
mankind.)
